Table 2 Comparisons of flow volume (ml) measurements between BH and FB protocols in aortic, pulmonary and tricuspid valve position in healthy subjects (n = 20) and patients with tricuspid regurgitation (n = 25).
BH | FB | MD ± SD | LoA | r | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AoFF | ||||||
Total | 76 ± 18 | 74 ± 18 | 1.4 ± 5.9 | -10.1–13.0 | 0.92 | 0.11 |
HS | 86 ± 17 | 85 ± 16 | 1.4 ± 4.1 | -6.6–9.4 | 0.96 | 0.15 |
TR | 67 ± 15 | 66 ± 15 | 1.5 ± 7.1 | -12.4–15.4 | 0.80 | 0.30 |
PuFF | ||||||
Total | 77 ± 19 | 76 ± 19 | 0.7 ± 6.2 | -11.3–12.8 | 0.92 | 0.42 |
HS | 88 ± 18 | 88 ± 17 | 0.41 ± 3.5 | -6.4–7.3 | 0.96 | 0.60 |
TR | 68 ± 15 | 66 ± 14 | 1.0 ± 7.7 | -14.1–16.1 | 0.82 | 0.18 |
TrIF | ||||||
Total | 88 ± 21 | 91 ± 24 | -3.2 ± 6.2 | -15.3–8.9 | 0.96 | 0.01 |
HS | 84 ± 18 | 85 ± 19 | -0.89 ± 4.1 | -8.9–7.1 | 0.95 | 0.34 |
TR | 90 ± 24 | 95 ± 26 | -5.1 ± 7.0 | -18.7–8.6 | 0.95 | 0.001 |
