Table 5 Comparison analysis with different existing techniques.
Operator | Score values | Ranking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVPFWA33 | \(0.0151\) | \(0.0872\) | \(0.02350\) | \(0.1794\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
IVPFWG33 | \(0.0074\) | \(0.0715\) | \(0.0132\) | \(0.1006\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
IVPFSSPOA34 | \(-0.3517\) | \(-0.2064\) | \(-0.2622\) | \(-0.1678\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
IVPFSSPOA34 | \(-0.2891\) | \(-0.1588\) | \(-0.1866\) | \(-0.1044\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
IVPPFWA35 | \(-0.0811\) | \(-0.0078\) | \(-0.0108\) | \(0.02452\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
IVPPFWG35 | \(-0.1481\) | \(-0.0583\) | \(-0.0873\) | \(-0.0344\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
Proposed IVFPFEWA | \(-0.0283\) | \(0.0049\) | \(0.00190\) | \(0.0215\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |
Proposed IVFPFEWG | \(-0.0634\) | \(-0.0163\) | \(-0.0312\) | \(-0.0084\) | \({\acute{Y} }_{4}>{\acute{Y} }_{2}>{\acute{Y} }_{3}>{\acute{Y} }_{1}\) |