Table 1 Comparison of ML and RSM approaches in predicting TPPs of nanofluids.
TPP | Reference | Nanofluid | ML (R2) | RSM (R2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DV | Oil/CeO2-GO-SA | GMDH-type ANN (0.9993) | 0.9930 | |
Oil/SnO2–CeO2 | ANFIS (0.9945) | 0.9990 | ||
Oil/MWCNT-TiO2 | ANN (0.999) | 0.991 | ||
Oil/MWCNT | ANN (0.9449) | 0.9969 | ||
Oil/SiO2-MWCNT | GMDH-type ANN (0.9996) | 0.9955 | ||
TC | Oil/GO-Fe3O4-TiO2 | GPR (0.9994) | 0.9888 | |
Glycerol, EG/SiO2 | ANN (0.994–0.995) | 0.994–0.997 | ||
Oil/MWCNT | ANN (0.9980) | 0.9961 | ||
Water/Fe3O4 | ANN (0.999) | 0.998 |