Table 6 Comparing the suggested work to a few earlier AOS.

From: An intelligent algorithm for optimizing player positioning using circular intuitionistic fuzzy COCOSO with Einstein aggregation

 

Operator

Score value

Ranking

Proposed work

CrIFEWA

\({S}_{1}=0.0641,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0893\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0666\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0925\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0531\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{5}\)

CrIFEWG

\({S}_{1}=0.0543,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0593\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0549\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0649\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0382\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{5}\)

Esra Çakır25

CrIFWA

\({S}_{1}=0.0663,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0958\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0692\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0983\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0563\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{5}\)

CrIFWG

\({S}_{1}=0.0518,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0524\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0520\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0597\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0347\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{5}\)

Alcantud39

IFWA (Circular degree is zero)

\({S}_{1}=0.0146,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0411\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0274\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0622\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0179\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{5}\)

IFWG (Circular degree is zero)

\({S}_{1}=0.0146,\)

\({S}_{2}=0.0015\),

\({S}_{3}=0.0125\),

\({S}_{4}=0.0260\)

\({S}_{5}=0.0006\)

\({q}_{4}>{q}_{1}>{q}_{3}>{q}_{2}>{q}_{5}\)

Wang and Feng75

IFYWA

Fail

Fail

IFYWG

Fail

Fail

Huang73

IFHWA

Fail

Fail

IFHWG

Fail

Fail

Verma and Rajkumar74

IFEPWA

Fail

Fail

IFEPWG

Fail

Fail

Seikh and Mandal72

IFDWA

Fail

Fail

IFDWG

Fail

Fail