Table 4 Test for accuracy of the DL (deep learning) process for the Culex (Linnaeus, 1758) species identification, in percentage of accuracy.
Predicted | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | ins | neav | neb | quinq | thal | trit | univ | Others | Nb | |
ins | 75.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 4 | |
T | neav | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52 |
r | neb | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 2 |
u | quinq | 0.0 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 92.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14 |
t | thal | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 2 |
h | trit | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 94.1 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 34 |
Univ | 0.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 5 | |
Others | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 99.1 | 905 |