Table 3 Test results of different attention mechanism models under traditional indicators.
From: Comparative analysis of attentional mechanisms in rice pest identification
Methods | Precision/% | Recall rate/% | mAP@50/% | Total number of model participants | Model size/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLOv5s | 79.6 | 81.9 | 83.9 | 7,047,883 | 13.7 |
YOLOv5s_CBAM | 75.6 | 80.6 | 83.4 | 7,581,773 | 14.7 |
YOLOv5s_SE | 82.7 | 83.5 | 86.0 | 7,080,651 | 13.8 |
YOLOv5s_SimAM | 80.4 | 82.9 | 84.0 | 7,057,387 | 13.7 |
YOLOv5s_BA | 87.1 | 85.5 | 88.9 | 7,085,641 | 13.8 |
