Table 8 Comparision of proposed operators with different methods.
Score values/closeness index | Ranking | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOPSIS method43 | 0.648205 | 0.612719 | 0.684162 | 0.651490 | \({{\mathcal{S}}}_{3}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{4}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{1}>{\mathcal{S}}_{2}\) |
VIKOR method45 | 0.436127 | 0.419828 | 0.478415 | 0.442535 | \({{\mathcal{S}}}_{3}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{4}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{1}>{\mathcal{S}}_{2}\) |
Similarity measures49 | 0.518973 | 0.526964 | 0.540342 | 0.534931 | \({{\mathcal{S}}}_{3}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{4}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{2}>{\mathcal{S}}_{1}\) |
Proposed q-ROFSAAWA | 0.018252 | 0.025915 | 0.053081 | − 0.036378 | \({{\mathcal{S}}}_{3}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{2}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{1}>{\mathcal{S}}_{4}\) |
Proposed q-ROFSAAWG | − 0.578591 | − 0.613440 | − 0.555141 | − 0.568486 | \({{\mathcal{S}}}_{3}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{4}>{{\mathcal{S}}}_{1}>{\mathcal{S}}_{2}\) |
