Table 3 Acceptability of the self- and provider-sampling model among screened women.

From: Accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study in rural Yunnan, China

 

Self-sampling,

number (%)

Provider-sampling, Number (%)

\(\chi^{2}\)

df

p value

Total

1110 (37.0)

1890 (63.0)

   

Age, years old

 < 40

587 (53.2)

516 (46.8)

215.9

2

< 0.001

 40–59

506 (28.3)

1281 (71.7)

   

 ≥ 60

17 (15.5)

93 (84.5)

   

Ethnic

 Dai minority

650 (40.6)

952 (59.4)

53.2

2

< 0.001

 Han Ethnic

224 (42.7)

301 (57.3)

   

 Other minorities

236 (27.0)

637 (73.0)

   

Education level

 Junior high school and the below

893 (34.8)

1674 (65.2)

96.7

2

< 0.001

 Senior high school

130 (39.9)

196 (60.1)

   

 College and the above

87 (81.3)

20 (18.7)

   

Marriage status

 Married

1058 (37.2)

1785 (62.8)

1.1

1

0.301

 Divorced/unmarried

52 (33.1)

105 (66.9)

   

KAP for cervical cancer

 Good (score ≥ 5 points)

454 (45.7)

540 (54.3)

48.0

1

< 0.001

 Inferior (score < 5 point)

656 (32.7)

1350 (67.3)

   

Cervical cancer screening history

 Yes

687 (47.6)

756 (52.4)

134.3

1

< 0.001

 No

423 (27.2)

1134 (72.8)

   
  1. df, degrees of freedom; KAP, knowledge, attitudes, and practice. The KAP score were defined as: know about HPV (2 points), never know about HPV (1 points); know about HPV causes cervical cancer (3 points), not sure about HPV causes cervical cancer (2 points), never know about HPV causes cervical cancer (1 points); had cervical cancer screening before (2 points), never had cervical cancer screening before (1 points).