Table 7 Group differences in the impact of social support on the positive coping styles of breadwinner mothers.

From: The impact of social support on the improvement of positive coping styles among disadvantaged breadwinner mothers

 

Breadwinner mothers without friends

Breadwinner mothers with friends

Model 5

Model 6

Predictor variables: social support

 Perception of social support services

0.100

0.205**

 Utilization of social support services

0.040**

− 0.105

 Evaluation of support service effectiveness

0.215***

0.173***

Control variables

 Age

− 0.005

0.019**

 Household registration type

0.215

0.119

 Educational level

0.185**

0.189***

 Professional skill level

0.076

0.223**

 Perceived stress

0.097

0.042

 General social trust

0.070

0.144*

 Constant

− 1.332**

2.424****

 N

138

378

 Adjusted R2

16.2%

13.1%

 F-value

3.958 (P = 0)

4.993 (P = 0)

  1. Notes: (1) significance levels: *P ≤ 0.1, **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.001. (2) Collinearity diagnostics show that all variable tolerances are greater than 0.1, and all VIFs are less than 2, indicating no significant collinearity issues among the variables.
Back to article page