Table 2 Statistical significance of differences in the mean carbon isotopic compositions of mammals between different regions as determined by two-tailed t-tests.
From: Savanna ecosystems and mammalian adaptations in Mid-Miocene Northern China
Sample | Mean difference (%) | t | p | Significant difference at 95% CI? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Junggar δ13C vs. Tongxin δ13C | 1.07 | 6.12 | 5.4591E-09 | Yes |
Junggar δ13C vs. Germany δ13C | 2.17 | 12.65 | 7.768E-27 | Yes |
Junggar δ13C vs. Madrid δ13C | 0.55 | 2.44 | 0.0164 | Yes |
Tongxin δ13C vs. Germany δ13C | 1.10 | 7.04 | 3.8527E-11 | Yes |
Tongxin δ13C vs. Madrid δ13C | 0.52 | 2.62 | 0.0098 | Yes |
Germany δ13C vs. Madrid δ13C | 1.61 | 8.42 | 6.153E-14 | Yes |
Junggar δ13C vs. Oregon δ13C | 1.58 | 10.96 | 4.7565E-24 | Yes |
Tongxin δ13C vs. Oregon δ13C | 0.52 | 3.72 | 0.0002 | Yes |
Germany δ13C vs. Oregon δ13C | 0.58 | 4.25 | 2.8408E-05 | Yes |
Madrid δ13C vs. Oregon δ13C | 1.03 | 5.30 | 2.404E-07 | Yes |
Nebraska δ13C vs. Oregon δ13C | 1.18 | 10.48 | 5.5657E-23 | Yes |
Junggar δ13C vs. Nebraska δ13C | 0.40 | 2.64 | 0.0088 | Yes |
Tongxin δ13C vs. Nebraska δ13C | 0.67 | 4.61 | 6.2455E-06 | Yes |
Germany δ13C vs. Nebraska δ13C | 1.77 | 12.41 | 2.3891E-28 | Yes |
Madrid δ13C vs. Nebraska δ13C | 0.15 | 0.77 | 0.44 | No |