Table 5 Comparing the robustness of the proposed ASDB gates against possible defects with previous works10,12,13,19.
ASDB gates | Proposed design | Design in10 | Design in19 | Design in13 | Design in12 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DB omission (%) | DB deposition (%) | DB omission (%) | DB deposition (%) | DB omission (%) | DB deposition (%) | DB omission (%) | DB deposition (%) | DB omission (%) | DB deposition (%) | |
AND | 48 | 56 | 22 | 42 | 21 | 35 | 22 | 33 | 28 | 42 |
NAND | 54 | 65 | 44 | 44 | 35 | 28 | 33 | 33 | 55 | 55 |
OR | 44 | 41 | 22 | 42 | 22 | 28 | 22 | 22 | 28 | 42 |
NOR | 67 | 60 | 33 | 55 | NR | NR | NR | NR | 66 | 66 |
XOR | 68 | 63 | 66 | 66 | 55 | 55 | 66 | 42 | 77 | 77 |
XNOR | 54 | 54 | 55 | 66 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Average | 56 | 55 | 40 | 53 | 22 | 24 | 36 | 33 | 51 | 56 |