Table 6 Classification results for the presented model with Nadam optimizer.
CNN | Class | Model performance (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | AUC | ||
After pre-processing Split: (80:20) | Benign | 99.3 | 100 | 99.5 | 97.3 | 1.0 |
Malignant | 98.8 | 99.7 | 99.6 | 97.7 | 1.0 | |
Normal | 99.4 | 100 | 99.4 | 98.1 | 1.0 | |
Average | 99.15 | 99.7 | 99.5 | 97.7 | 1.0 | |
After pre-processing Split: (10 Folds) | Benign Malignant Normal Average | 98.7 | 99.1 | 98.1 | 98.4 | 0.99 |
98.5 | 98.8 | 98.8 | 98.1 | 0.99 | ||
99.1 | 99.5 | 98.2 | 98.7 | 1.0 | ||
98.7 | 99.1 | 98.3 | 98.4 | 0.99 | ||
