Table 3 Comparison with other related studies.
From: Comparative chromium adsorptive capacity of different low-cost materials using fixed bed column
S.No | Adsorbent | Metal Ion | Removal Efficiency/Adsorption Capacity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Groundnut Shell | Chromium | 81.6% | |
2. | Arachis hypogea husk | Chromium | 2.355 mg/g | |
3. | Cashew nutshell | Chromium Manganese | 56.40% 53.09% | |
4. | Sea-fruit-shell biomass | Cadmium | 76.86% | |
5. | Nanocomposite cellulose hydrogel | Nickel Cadmium | 99.23% 99.36% | |
6. | Hybrid granular activated carbon | Mercury | 92.31% | |
7. | Tire-derived activated carbon (TAC) | Lead | 114.26 mg/g | |
8. | Diphenylamine coordinated cobalt complex (Co-DPA) | Cadmium Lead Chromium | 95.6% 99.5% 99.5% | |
9. | Acid-modified Rice Straw | Cadmium | 91.84% | |
10. | Activated Charcoal Rice Husk Sawdust | Chromium | 58.34% 50.93% 42.78% | Present Study |
