Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included studies.

From: Aspiration risk prediction models in patients with nasogastric enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year)

Country

Study design

Participants

Incidence (%)

Diagnostic criteria

Jing13

China

Retrospective study

patients aged ≥ 18 and received EN

20.0

The expert consensus of the NAA

Peng14

China

Retrospective study

Patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage and received EN

39.9

The expert consensus of the NAA

Guan15

China

Retrospective study

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with severe acute pancreatitis and received EN

9.46

The expert consensus of the NAA

Guan16

China

Retrospective study

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with severe acute pancreatitis and received EN

9.46

The expert consensus of the NAA

Zhang17

China

Retrospective study

patients aged > 18 and received EN

20.9

Hou18

China

Retrospective study

Patients with acute pancreatitis and received EN

15.62

The expert consensus of the NAA

Zhang19

China

Retrospective study

Patients aged ≥ 18 with severe acute pancreatitis and

received EN

28.31

Yu20

China

Retrospective study

Patients aged ≥ 18 with severe traumatic brain injury and received EN

48.11

The expert consensus of the NAA

Xie21

China

Retrospective study

patients with acute cerebral infarction and received EN

49.87

The expert consensus of the NAA

Shi22

China

Retrospective study

Neurosurgical patients aged ≥ 65 and received EN

24.69

the expert consensus of The NAA

Sun23

China

Retrospective study

patients aged ≥ 18 and received EN

24.03

the expert consensus of the NAA

  1. NAA: North American Association.
  2. “-”, not reported.