Table 10 Band gap energy analysis.
Sl.no. | Materials | Method | Band gap energy (eV) | Observations | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Co-doped SnO2 | Sol–Gel | 2.85 | Slight band gap narrowing with cobalt doping | |
2 | SnO2 | Sol–gel | 3.26 | Band gap narrowing due to particle size effects | |
3 | SnO2 thin-film (FTO) | Chemical deposition | 3.65 | Higher band gap due to fluorine and indium doping | |
4 | SnO2 | Hydrothermal | 3.87 | Higher band gap enhances gas sensing capabilities | |
5 | Al-doped SnO2 | Precipitation | 3.15 | Band gap increases slightly with Zn doping | |
6 | SnO2 and ZnO thin films | Thin film deposition | 3 | SnO2 shows higher band gap with improved crystallinity | |
7 | SnO2 nanostructures | Sol–Gel | 3.36 | Band gap decreases with increasing temperature | |
8 | SnO2 and MoS2 | Hydrothermal | 2.68 | MoS2 inclusion leads to band gap narrowing |