Table 1 Parameter of the FIDES inverse dispersion model used to compute the chlorothalonil flux F and its uncertainty with Eq. (2). The Monte Carlo method used each parameter’s mean and standard deviation to quantify the uncertainty in the flux F.

From: First online field measurements of chlorothalonil volatilisation using proton transfer mass spectrometry and inverse modelling

Parameter

Units

Mean

SD

References

Roughness length z0

m

0.0035*

0.0004*

Measured log-normal distribution49

Displacement height

m

0.15–0.44#

0.03

Measured normal distribution49

Sensor location (x, y,z)

(m, m, m)

variable

(1,1,0.1)

GPS positioning error in x and y and soil roughness in z

Friction velocity u*

m s−1

measured

14% $

Spatial variability of u* as reported by92

Wind direction

deg/N

Variable

12.5 deg

Measured spatial standard deviation among 3 sensors

Obukhov length L

-

Variable

40% $

Computed assuming a 14% error on both u* and H

σw £

m s−1

Variable

14% $

Assumed similar in magnitude to u*

\(\:C\)

ng m−3

Variable

14% $

Uncertainty based on calibration curve (Supp. Figure 8)

\(\:{C}_{bgd}\)

ng m−3

5.7

2.2

Concentration measured during 2 days before application

  1. * log-normal distribution parameters (mean and variance). # varying value taken as \(\:\frac{2}{3}{h}_{c}\), where \(\:{h}_{c}\) is the canopy height. $ percentage of the mean value. £ σw is the lateral wind component standard deviation.