Table 1 Parameter of the FIDES inverse dispersion model used to compute the chlorothalonil flux F and its uncertainty with Eq. (2). The Monte Carlo method used each parameter’s mean and standard deviation to quantify the uncertainty in the flux F.
Parameter | Units | Mean | SD | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Roughness length z0 | m | 0.0035* | 0.0004* | Measured log-normal distribution49 |
Displacement height | m | 0.15–0.44# | 0.03 | Measured normal distribution49 |
Sensor location (x, y,z) | (m, m, m) | variable | (1,1,0.1) | GPS positioning error in x and y and soil roughness in z |
Friction velocity u* | m s−1 | measured | 14% $ | Spatial variability of u* as reported by92 |
Wind direction | deg/N | Variable | 12.5 deg | Measured spatial standard deviation among 3 sensors |
Obukhov length L | - | Variable | 40% $ | Computed assuming a 14% error on both u* and H |
σw £ | m s−1 | Variable | 14% $ | Assumed similar in magnitude to u* |
\(\:C\) | ng m−3 | Variable | 14% $ | Uncertainty based on calibration curve (Supp. Figure 8) |
\(\:{C}_{bgd}\) | ng m−3 | 5.7 | 2.2 | Concentration measured during 2 days before application |