Table 1 Comparative analysis of current/voltage-based techniques for internal fault discrimination.

From: Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of power transformer based on non-invasive measurement

Method

References

General features

Non‐invasive/ invasive

Sensorless/ Sensor

Online

Offline

Differential relay

1,2

Low sensitivity

Non

Sensorless

Very simple and robust

Mal-operation occurrence during operation

Effect of CT saturation, magnetizing current and errors

Negative sequence

6,7,8,9

Reasonable sensitivity (3%)

Non

Sensorless

__

Production of negative current in case of un-grounded faults

Impact of CT saturation, magnetizing current and errors

voltage transformer limitations

each side of the transformer must be loaded

Algorithms do not consider incipient nature

Negative Sequence-Based Positive Impedance Method

9

Error in case of online computations

Non

Sensorless

__

Simple calculation process

Reasonable sensitivity (2.5%)

OLTC operation adaptation

Still stable at 10% over-excitation

In case of unbalanced load and source, the algorithm still stable

localization the internal fault cannot be achieved

Zero sequence

22,23

Errors due to using CT and VT

Non

Sensorless

__

Still stable in inrush current cases

Needs calibration in delta winding connection

The healthy condition data must be existed

Valid for transformer bank only

ΔV‐I locus diagram

12

Can deal with various faults

Non

Sensorless

__

Errors due to using CT and VT

The healthy condition data must be existed

Extended Park’s vector approach

13,14,15,16

Cannot acts well for unbalance load

Non

Sensorless

__

Cannot operate in transformer energization

Measuring instruments error

Can detect only 4% turns faults

Magnetic Flux Test

24

Can detect the faulty phase

Non

Sensorless

__

The implementation for Y-connection for 3-phase transformer

Cannot applied for five-leg core

Error due to flux interception