Table 2 Comparative analysis of the proposed structure with related solar cell materials.
Ref. | Materials | Wavelength (\(\:{\upmu\:}\text{m}\)) | Maximum Absorption Amplitude |
|---|---|---|---|
This Study | Au, Si/SiO2/InP, TI (Bi1.5Sb0.5Te1.8Se1.2) | \(\:0.2-1.6\) | > 99.9% |
Si, SiO2, Ti, | \(\:0.3-2.5\) | 99% | |
SiO2, Tungsten, Si3N4 | \(\:0.44-0.54\) | 99.8% | |
Ni/SiO2 | \(\:0.4-0.7\) | 99% | |
Au/MgF2, Tungsten | \(\:0.25-3\) | > 98% | |
ZnSe, Cu | \(\:8.5-20\) | 99.28% | |
Au, Cu, Ag, Al | \(\:0.4-0.66\) | 99.7% | |
Al, Ga As | \(\:0.44-0.6\) | 99.96% | |
W, AlN | \(\:1-4\) | 41% | |
Au, SiO2 | \(\:0.7-1.9\) | 97.88% | |
TiN, SiO2, TiO2 | \(\:0.19-1.9\) | > 90% | |
W/MgF2, Ti | \(\:0.3-20\) | 78% | |
Au, SiO2 | \(\:0.5-2.5\) | ~ 90% | |
Glass, Ag, SiO2 | \(\:0.3-0.75\) | 92% | |
graphene/dielectric/graphene | \(\:1.5-4.5\) THz | \(\:-\) | |
Ag, SiO2 | \(\:0.5-0.8\) | \(\:-\) | |
Au, graphene, SiO2 | \(\:0.5-2.5\) THz | 98.9% | |
Metal, TI, SiO2 | \(\:0.2-1.6\) | close to 1 or 100% | |
Si3N4-TiN, SiO2, Ti | \(\:280-2500\:\text{n}\text{m}\) | 97.77% | |
TiN, | \(\:300-2500\:\text{n}\text{m}\) | 95.2% | |
graphene SiO2, Au | \(\:26.73995\:\text{T}\text{H}\text{z}\:\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\:26.75145\:\text{T}\text{H}\text{z}\) | 99.72 and 99.64% |
