Table 5 Ablation study based on various deep learning models vs proposed model using MCCV method.
Model | Parameters | Size (MB) | MCCV accuracy | MCCV F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
InceptionV3 | 23.9 M | 23.9 | 95.0% ± 1.2% | 91.2% ± 1.4% |
ResNet50 | 25.6 M | 96 | 92.1% ± 0.9% | 91.8% ± 1.0% |
MobileNetV2 | 3.5 M | 13 | 89.3% ± 1.7% | 88.9% ± 1.8% |
VGG19 | 143.6 M | 535 | 90.7% ± 1.0% | 90.2% ± 1.1% |
ViT-larg16 | 307 M | 924 | 93.4% ± 0.8% | 93.0% ± 0.9% |
Proposed ViT | 5.7 M | 22.6 | 98.9% ± 0.5% | 98.6% ± 0.6% |
Proposed IRBwSA | 1.3 M | 28.4 | 96.1% ± 0.7% | 95.9% ± 0.8% |