Table 1 Assessment of the existing literature with a detailed description.
From: Quadrant swapping technique for partial shaded solar photovoltaic system
PV size | The number of shading conditions tested | Irradiation level (W/m2) | Reconfiguration techniques compared | Maximum power enhancement | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9×9 | 4 | 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 | Total cross-tied, Su-do-Ku, Ancient Chinese Magic Square | 382.5 W | |
9×9 | 4 | 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 900 | Competence Square, Dominance Square, TCT | 5630 W | |
9×9 | 5 | 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 | Optimal-Su-do-Ku, TCT, Magic Square, Su-do-Ku | 69.3 W | |
9×9 | 4 | 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 900 | Column index, TCT, Dominance Square, SP | 5582 W | |
5×5 | 7 | 200, 500, 600, 900 | SP, Dominance Square, BL, HC, TCT, SP-TCT, BL-TCT, BL-HC | 20.62733 W | |
6×6 | 3 | 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 1000 | SP, HC, TCT, BL, Arrow SudoKu, Skyscraper technique | 5566 W | |
4×4 | 7 | 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, 600, 700, 900, 1000 | Dynamic, Couple matching, TCT, Square Dynamic | 136 W | |
3×3 | 3 | 200, 400, 600, 800 | SP, HC, TCT, BL, Sudoku, Dragonfly algorithm | 57.6 kW | |
4×4 | 10 | 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 | SP, TCT, SP-TCT, HC-TCT, Proposed method | 136 W | Proposed Work |
