Table 53 Quantitative analysis : proposed vs. baseline.
From: A hybrid deep learning model for detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks in VANETs
Model | Train % | Accuracy | Precision | Recall (Sensitivity) | F1-Score | FPR | FNR | ROC-AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR | 70% | 0.9256 | 0.9191 | 0.936 | 0.9278 | 0.081 | 0.064 | 0.9375 |
Random Forest | 70% | 0.9578 | 0.9458 | 0.9706 | 0.958 | 0.0548 | 0.0294 | 0.9579 |
SVM (Linear) | 70% | 0.9557 | 0.9408 | 0.9734 | 0.9573 | 0.0589 | 0.0273 | 0.9572 |
CNN | 70% | 0.9482 | 0.9387 | 0.9603 | 0.9498 | 0.0625 | 0.0397 | 0.9556 |
BiLSTM | 70% | 0.9544 | 0.9398 | 0.9707 | 0.9543 | 0.0613 | 0.0294 | 0.956 |
VANET-DDoSNet +  +  | 70% | 0.9804 | 0.987 | 0.987 | 0.987 | 0.0143 | 0.014 | 0.9906 |
LR | 80% | 0.9378 | 0.9261 | 0.9412 | 0.9337 | 0.072 | 0.058 | 0.9416 |
Random Forest | 80% | 0.9603 | 0.9493 | 0.9733 | 0.9617 | 0.0516 | 0.0272 | 0.9624 |
SVM (Linear) | 80% | 0.9589 | 0.9443 | 0.9779 | 0.9573 | 0.0567 | 0.0241 | 0.9636 |
CNN | 80% | 0.9501 | 0.9404 | 0.9643 | 0.952 | 0.0609 | 0.0357 | 0.9517 |
BiLSTM | 80% | 0.9557 | 0.9411 | 0.9728 | 0.9574 | 0.0593 | 0.0272 | 0.9568 |
VANET-DDoSNet++  | 80% | 0.9918 | 0.9915 | 0.9915 | 0.9915 | .0077 | 0.0085 | 0.997 |