Table 2 Comparison results of different indicators fusion.
From: A super-resolution network based on dual aggregate transformer for climate downscaling
| Â | Scale | \(Z_{H}\) | \(Z_{DR}\) | \(K_{DP}\) | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT | 2 | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | 37.74 | 0.8950 |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | 37.88 | 0.9412 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | 37.84 | 0.9577 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | 37.95 | 0.9597 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | 37.83 | 0.9413 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | 37.89 | 0.9600 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 37.91 | 0.9605 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 38.02 | 0.9607 | |
DAT | 4 | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | 31.99 | 0.8599 |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | Â | 31.56 | 0.8601 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | 32.83 | 0.8699 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | Â | 32.93 | 0.8725 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | 32.81 | 0.8710 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | Â | \(\checkmark\) | 32.88 | 0.8715 | |
DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 32.83 | 0.8724 | |
MC-DAT | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 32.92 | 0.8728 |
