Table 1 Characteristics of AEGIS study participants by sex.
From: Glucodensity functional profiles outperform traditional continuous glucose monitoring metrics
Men \((n=220)\) | Women \((n=361)\) | p-value (t-test) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Age, years | \(47.8\pm 14.8\) | \(48.2\pm 14.5\) | 0.04 |
A1c, % | \(5.6\pm 0.9\) | \(5.5\pm 0.7\) | 0.26 |
FPG mg/dL | \(97\pm 23\) | \(91\pm 21\) | \(<0.001\) |
HOMA-IR \(mg/dL.\mu UI/m\) | \(3.97\pm 5.56\) | \(2.74\pm 2.47\) | \(<0.001\) |
BMI \(kg/m^2\) | \(28.9\pm 4.7\) | \(27.7\pm 5.3\) | \(<0.001\) |
CONGA mg/dL | \(0.88\pm 0.40\) | \(0.86\pm 0.36\) | 0.03 |
MAGE mg/dL | \(33.6\pm 22.3\) | \(31.2 \pm 14.6\) | \(<0.001\) |
MODD | \(0.84\pm 0.58\) | \(0.77\pm 0.33\) | \(<0.001\) |
