Table 6 Comparative evaluation of the maximum adsorption capacities of MG-dye and NR-dye onto P@WT composite and recently reported adsorbent materials.

From: Phosphorylation of biowaste materials for effective removal of organic dye pollutants from aqueous solution; batch and dynamic investigation

Adsorbent

Time, min

pH

qe, mg/g

Ref.

MG-dye

NR-dye

Fe3O4/sawdust/ 10%MWCNT

30

7

35.5

--

9

Nontreated Sejnane Clay Type

10

9

119.6

--

42

Purified Sejnane Clay Type

240

149.9

--

Iron-manganese oxide/GO

160

8

195.7

--

43

Chitosan/Fe2O3/NiFe2O4

60

8

77.22

--

44

MCM-41

60

6

285.70

--

45

TiO2

45

6.3

384.6

--

46

MWCNT/TiO2/CS

15

7

269.98

--

47

ZIF-76

120

11

96.5

--

48

3E-2 H-BCs

60

8

153.6

--

49

ECS-MC

120

8

194.4

--

50

EC-Cs-OBA-Fe2O3

30

7.8

47.4

--

51

activated residual Dodonaea viscosa (ARDV)

180

6.6

99

--

52

MOR zeolite

60

9

40.57

--

53

Beta zeolite

60

9

25.05

--

HY zeolite

60

9

41.54

--

P@WT

180

4–7

445.5

--

This Work

rGO/SiO2 nanocomposites

60

5

--

66.635

54

CuO-NP

120

6

--

283

10

White clover

100

6

--

113.32

55

MDLZ

120

-

--

321.54

56

SD

60

6

--

208

40

MSD

60

6

--

227

TAPT-HMIPA-COF

11

7

--

429

57

PAsp-g-PAA/Fe3O4

10

6

--

90.59

58

B-C2

240

5

--

145

59

PANI − ZrPB nanocomposite

240

11

--

56.0

60

MHPMs

10

7

--

61.5

61

P@WT

180

5–7

--

493.65

This Work