Table 4 The data related to Pareto frontier points’ decision variables and objective function values.
Point | Description | Decision Variables | Objective Functions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\:{\varvec{T}}_{1}\) | \(\:{\varvec{T}}_{3}\) | \(\:{\dot{\varvec{m}}}_{6}/{\dot{\varvec{m}}}_{9}\) | Specific energy consumption (SEC) [kWh/L] | Number of loops to reach steady state | ||
A | Min energy to mass ratio | 88.03 | 65.0434 | 1.2994 | 0. 6304 | 11,577 |
B | Closest point to the ideal point (Best point) | 91.5 | 65.0123 | 1.2998 | 0.6307 | 10,071 |
C | Min number of loops to reach steady state | 94.7 | 65.0117 | 1.3 | 0. 6312 | 9005 |
