Table 4 Performance comparison of PID, FOPID, SMC and LQR controllers for RO desalination.
| Â | Rated from the permeate flow rate Qpref and Product | Evaluated performance | Techniques used for RO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water Salinity Cpref | PID | FOPID | SMC | LQR | ||
step 0–7 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
0.02 m3/h | Settling time(h) | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.05 | 1.56 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 12 | 9 | 7 | 1 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.05 | 1.56 | |
step 7–11 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
0.24 m3/h | Settling time(h) | 3.384 | 3.25 | 2.1 | 0.5 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 30 | 21 | 12 | 2 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.5 | 0.48 | |
step 11–15 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.62 | 0.6 | 0.58 | 0.50 |
0.35m3/h | Settling time(h) | 2.62 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.82 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 32 | 25 | 25 | 2 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 1.74 | 1.33 | 1.2 | 0.64 | |
step 15–19 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.34 |
0.198m3/h | Settling time(h) | 3.90 | 3.68 | 3.18 | 2.1 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 22 | 17 | 13 | 2 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.27 | |
step 19–22 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
0.118m3/h | Settling time(h) | 3 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 1.43 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 52 | 18 | 18 | 2 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.43 | |
step 22–24 h |  | Rise time(h) | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.34 |
0.032m3/h | Settling time(h) | 2 | 1.96 | 1.85 | 1.2 | |
5.2Â mg/l | Overshoot (%) | 28 | 19 | 15 | 2 | |
| Â | Peak time (h) | 1.37 | 1.30 | 0.92 | 0.37 | |
Control effort | Â | Â | Low | Moderate-Low | Moderate | High |