Table 16 Model performance of different adversarial training methods.
From: An incremental adversarial training method enables timeliness and rapid new knowledge acquisition
Attack methods | Adversarial training methods | Evaluation metrics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Robust-accuracy | ||
FGSM | Method one | 0.9827 | 0.9823 | 0.9829 | 0.9826 | 0.9027 |
Method two | 0.9720 | 0.9715 | 0.9721 | 0.9716 | 0.8493 | |
Proposed methodology | 0.9933 | 0.9931 | 0.9935 | 0.9933 | 0.9533 | |
PGD | Method one | 0.9813 | 0.9808 | 0.9817 | 0.9811 | 0.9000 |
Method two | 0.9773 | 0.9973 | 0.9779 | 0.9773 | 0.8507 | |
Proposed methodology | 0.9907 | 0.9904 | 0.9906 | 0.9905 | 0.9467 | |
BIM | Method one | 0.9840 | 0.9838 | 0.9847 | 0.9840 | 0.9093 |
Method two | 0.9827 | 0.9824 | 0.9827 | 0.9825 | 0.8733 | |
Proposed methodology | 0.9920 | 0.9916 | 0.9921 | 0.9918 | 0.9360 | |