Table 3 Performance analysis under varying disparity ranges, best results highlighted in bold.
LF Type | disparity | LF Methods | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFR 46 | LBAM 47 | DeOccNet 23 | Zhang et al. 26 | Ours | ||
4-Syn | (-12, 9) | 25.73 / 0.815 | 25.00 / 0.809 | 24.56 / 0.810 | 27.09 / 0.866 | 26.89 / 0.852 |
4-Syn | (-9, -4) | 19.89 / 0.608 | 21.11 / 0.677 | 23.74 / 0.701 | 14.46 / 0.683 | 27.41 / 0.873 |
4-Syn | (-6, 4.5) | 24.19 / 0.772 | 23.39 / 0.766 | 25.06 / 0.812 | 26.96 / 0.823 | 27.13 / 0.841 |
9-Syn | (-5, 5) | 27.94 / 0.881 | 27.85 / 0.876 | 20.92 / 0.738 | 28.39 / 0.913 | 28.52 / 0.894 |
9-Syn | (-9, -4) | 20.69 / 0.672 | 23.04 / 0.725 | 23.70 / 0.715 | 22.00 / 0.75 | 28.13 / 0.870 |