Table 2 The weights were calculated by means of the entropy weight method.

From: Assessment and evolution analysis of urban infrastructure resilience under flood disaster scenarios based on the PSR model and extension catastrophe progression

General objectives

Dimension

Weighting

Primary indicator

Weighting

Secondary indicators

Weighting

Sort

Urban infrastructure resilience

A Stress resilience

0.143

A1 Rainfall and human activity conditions

0.018

A11 Annual average daily rainfall

0.007

24

A12 Population density

0.011

15

A2 Topography and rivers

0.124

A21 Elevation

0.05

4

A22 Slope orientation

0.02

16

A23Slope

0.031

9

A24 River density

0.023

15

B state resilience

0.343

B1 Energy supply

0.067

B11 Natural gas supply capacity

0.024

13

B12 Power supply capacity

0.031

8

B13 Electricity consumption per capita

0.012

22

B2 Treatment of water supply and drainage

0.067

B21 Integrated water supply generation capacity

0.026

10

B22 Urban sewage treatment rate

0.006

25

B23 Density of drainage pipe network

0.035

7

B3 Transportation operational capacity

0.156

B31 Highway density

0.017

18

B32 Density of public transportation coverage

0.017

19

B33 Cargo turnover capacity

0.122

3

B4 Communication capacity

0.052

B41 Number of cell phone subscribers

0.015

21

B42 Number of Internet broadband access

0.038

5

C Response resilience

0.514

C1 Funding and staffing

0.096

C11 Level of local fiscal tax revenues

0.036

6

C12 Economic density

0.016

20

C13 Employment level in the electricity, heat, gas, water production and supply industry

0.02

17

C14 Number of employees in the water conservancy, environmental protection, and public facilities management industry

0.025

12

C2 Capacity of medical institutions

0.048

C21 Number of health technicians per 10,000 people

0.025

11

C22 Number of beds in health institutions per 10,000 people in the city

0.024

14

C3 Research investment

0.37

C31 Full-time equivalent level of R&D personnel

0.195

1

C32 R&D Funding Input Level

0.175

2

Back to article page