Table 5 Performance of the proposed GER detection method for the 6th channel at elementwise classification level.

From: Segmentation of gastroesophageal reflux events using a semi-U-Net architecture with 1D/2D CNNs

Episode #

Semi-U-Net model

Acc (%)

Sen (%)

PPV (%)

F1

Duration* (s)

TE* (s)

197

2D-1D

90.8167

91.4538

66.7383

0.7717

20.36

1.82

 

1D

89.7000

93.6149

63.2802

0.7552

 

1.84

80

2D-1D

93.7667

85.5225

74.5547

0.7966

13.90

0.24

 

1D

93.0750

86.5733

71.1612

0.7811

 

1.44

4

2D-1D

91.7778

64.8620

78.3456

0.7097

20.36

10.50

 

1D

91.5278

66.8698

75.6285

0.7098

 

10.36

93

2D-1D

92.4125

64.6980

82.8826

0.7267

19.06

2.02

 

1D

92.2417

68.3057

79.0842

0.7330

 

0.70

133

2D-1D

92.7083

60.0715

86.3599

0.7086

26.46

4.58

 

1D

92.3806

63.7801

80.5324

0.7118

 

3.70

172

2D-1D

93.4762

61.9015

87.8173

0.7262

11.14

2.70

 

1D

93.2691

65.7863

82.5000

0.7320

 

3.32

52

2D-1D

93.8625

63.9344

89.5717

0.7461

18.04

0.58

 

1D

93.7562

67.8334

84.8670

0.7540

 

1.08

142

2D-1D

94.2019

65.9539

90.9887

0.7647

18.90

0.08

 

1D

94.1500

69.6734

86.7797

0.7729

 

0.40

102

2D-1D

94.4750

66.2464

91.6293

0.7690

12.24

0.40

 

1D

94.4183

70.0648

87.2067

0.7770

 

0.58

191

2D-1D

94.6606

67.5999

91.1111

0.7761

14.18

1.50

 

1D

94.6545

71.5946

87.0677

0.7858

 

1.80

97

2D-1D

94.5944

67.7558

92.0766

0.7807

23.70

3.74

 

1D

94.6972

72.0505

88.4578

0.7942

 

3.70

24

2D-1D

94.1141

69.2521

88.4040

0.7766

26.08

0.04

 

1D

94.1923

73.4166

85.2337

0.7889

 

0.52

157

2D-1D

94.1893

71.7924

87.0909

0.7871

20.76

3.92

 

1D

94.3643

75.6129

85.0492

0.8005

 

4.24

120

2D-1D

94.3956

71.7088

87.5431

0.7884

10.78

1.58

 

1D

94.5944

75.6163

85.5761

0.8029

 

2.38

148

2D-1D

93.9896

72.1398

82.6488

0.7704

6.28

4.30

 

1D

94.1573

76.1422

80.9252

0.7846

 

4.74

2

2D-1D

93.8951

70.9266

83.4339

0.7667

20.24

10.14

 

1D

94.1265

75.1750

81.8271

0.7836

 

7.52

32

2D-1D

93.5500

70.6131

82.3407

0.7603

24.28

7

 

1D

93.7472

74.9409

80.5372

0.7764

 

10.88, 4

108

2D-1D

93.6561

72.2506

83.1230

0.7731

28.12

2.72

 

1D

93.8605

76.3329

81.4495

0.7881

 

2.52

181

2D-1D

93.4933

71.6150

83.5766

0.7713

10.42, 7

0.02, –

 

1D

93.7675

76.3513

81.7716

0.7897

 

0.36, –

144

2D-1D

93.4683

71.8502

82.9500

0.7700

15.72

1.96

 

1D

93.5063

76.2255

80.1371

0.7813

 

3.00

Total

2D-1D

93.5743

69.8250

84.6066

0.7603

17.52 ± 6.39

2.99 ± 3.09

 

1D

93.5027

73.5129

81.3523

0.7683

 

3.25 ± 3.09

  1. *Amounts are reported as mean ± std.
  2. For the total case (averaged results across all 20 test episodes), the bold values highlight the highest scores achieved when comparing the two methods, 2D-1D and 1D.