Table 6 Quantitative evaluation of component contributions in the proposed framework via ablation study.

From: Segmentation of gastroesophageal reflux events using a semi-U-Net architecture with 1D/2D CNNs

Configurations

Acc (%)

Sen (%)

PPV (%)

F1

Name

Description

C1

Without GER definition criteria

93.12 ± 3.82

88.60 ± 4.85

73.62 ± 9.33

0.79 ± 0.06

C2

Without morphological edit

93.48 ± 1.18

66.41 ± 6.38

87.08 ± 6.90

0.74 ± 0.03

C3

Without cross sections with BI

92.37 ± 3.88

89.99 ± 4.78

70.15 ± 8.50

0.78 ± 0.05

C4

No post-process

93.57 ± 0.92

69.82 ± 7.08

84.60 ± 5.91

0.76 ± 0.02

C5

Proposed method

96.72 ± 0.88

84.90 ± 6.16

92.05 ± 1.71

0.88 ± 0.03

  1. The bold values in the Proposed Method row denote the best performance scores for the metrics presented.