Table 9 Performance comparison of MSO63 and CGFFCM62 on segmentation quality metrics.
Method | Sample | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 Score | Jaccard | Dice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Song et al.(2024) | 1 | 0.8023 | 0.2195 | 0.3935 | 0.2353 | 0.2193 | 0.2353 |
2 | 0.8138 | 0.2035 | 0.2500 | 0.2243 | 0.2035 | 0.2243 | |
3 | 0.9657 | 0.6856 | 0.5886 | 0.6102 | 0.5491 | 0.6102 | |
4 | 0.8423 | 0.4526 | 0.5033 | 0.4735 | 0.4221 | 0.4735 | |
Golzari Oskouei et al.(2021) | 1 | 0.8470 | 0.3890 | 0.3418 | 0.3432 | 0.2943 | 0.3432 |
2 | 0.9091 | 0.5120 | 0.5770 | 0.4937 | 0.4342 | 0.4937 | |
3 | 0.9725 | 0.6655 | 0.6914 | 0.6744 | 0.6215 | 0.6744 | |
4 | 0.8600 | 0.4178 | 0.4215 | 0.4182 | 0.3527 | 0.4182 |