Table 4 The performance comparison of the IDEALS scheme against various SOTA protocols across different evaluation metrics is shown here. It categorises performance levels into low, moderate, and high, clearly Understanding how IDEALS outperforms others in specific areas of network performance.
From: Improved distance and energy aware link stability protocol for internet of medical things
Metric | IDEALS | HEEMCCP | SD-WBAN | QQAR | SEEDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDR | High | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Low |
EE | High | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Low |
EtoED (ms) | Low | High | High | Moderate | High |
Throughput (kbps) | High | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate |
LS | High | Moderate | Low | Low | Moderate |
CCR | Low | Moderate | High | High | High |
NLT (alive/dead nodes) | Longer | Moderate | Shorter | Shorter | Shorter |
Routing Overhead (RO) | Low | Moderate | High | High | High |
Data Reliability (DR) | High | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Low |
Adaptability and Scalability to Dynamic Topology | High | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Low |
PL (dB) | Low | Moderate | High | Moderate | High |
BER | Low | Moderate | High | High | High |
PER | Low | Moderate | High | High | High |
MSE | Low | Moderate | High | High | High |
