Table 2 Descriptives and paired sample differences in accuracy and reaction times.

From: Effects on nonverbal numerical acuity performance after a single-session transient random noise stimulation over the intraparietal sulcus or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

  

Accuracy

Reaction time

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Sham Pre

Parietal

67.63

2.01

3203.35

183.98

Frontal

71.29

1.58

3549.23

208.81

Sham Post

Parietal

69.55

1.87

2795.97

165.52

Frontal

72.74

1.39

3403.3

227.74

tRNS Pre

Parietal

67.02

2.05

3178.17

171.58

Frontal

70.76

1.74

3977.27

330.41

tRNS Post

Parietal

70.45

2.29

2835.11

126.49

Frontal

71.89

1.54

3514.27

235.92

S1 Pre

Parietal

68

2.16

3238.54

198.74

Frontal

70.82

1.66

3942.01

280.26

S2 Pre

Parietal

66.65

1.88

3142.98

153.52

Frontal

71.24

1.67

3584.49

275.26

Sham Pre–Sham Post

Parietal

-1.93

6.21

407.37

441.65

Frontal

-1.45

5.65

145.94

584.73

tRNS Pre–tRNS Post

Parietal

-3.43

5.53

343.05

605.79

Frontal

-1.14

5.69

462.99

849.3

S1 Pre–S2 Pre

Parietal

1.35

5.45

95.56

905.86

Frontal

-0.42

6.89

357.52

1156.71

  1. The groups are labelled as follows: ‘Sham Pre’ = Task completed before the sham session; ‘Sham Post’ = task completed after the sham session; ‘tRNS pre’ = task completed before the stimulation session; ‘tRNS Post’ = task completed after the stimulation session. The means of the results before the first (‘S1 Pre’) and second session (‘S2 Pre’) were also compared to assess whether there was a different baseline between the sessions.
Back to article page