Table 3 Results of single and double step Framework.
Station | Algorithm type | Optimizer | MSE | RMSE | MAE | R2 | Activation function | Neuron |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sylhet | Â | HHO | 2.96 | 1.72 | 1.12 | 0.99 | relu | 3 |
Conventional model (Single step) | ESOA | 25.94 | 5.09 | 2.57 | 0.91 | relu | 14 | |
| Â | PSO | 4.97 | 2.23 | 1.06 | 0.98 | relu | 12 | |
| Â | GA | 7.86 | 2.8 | 1.42 | 0.97 | leakyrelu | 10 | |
| Â | HO | 199.65 | 14.12 | 6.94 | 0.34 | leakyrelu | 10 | |
| Â | HHO-HHO | 1.75 | 1.32 | 0.59 | 0.99 | leakyrelu | 4 | |
Proposed model (Double step) | HHO-ESOA | 1.71 | 1.31 | 0.64 | 0.99 | leakyrelu | 7 | |
| Â | HHO-PSO | 4.92 | 2.21 | 0.83 | 0.98 | leakyrelu | 6 | |
| Â | HHO-GA | 1.94 | 1.39 | 0.73 | 0.99 | relu | 3 | |
| Â | HHO-HO | 5.06 | 2.24 | 1.25 | 0.98 | relu | 10 | |
Chittagong | Â | HHO | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.3 | 0.99 | relu | 24 |
Conventional model (Single step) | ESOA | 6.29 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 0.96 | leakyrelu | 30 | |
| Â | PSO | 0.078 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.99 | relu | 24 | |
| Â | GA | 2.7 | 1.64 | 1.48 | 0.98 | relu | 30 | |
| Â | HO | 43.12 | 6.56 | 3.2 | 0.78 | leakyrelu | 10 | |
| Â | HHO-HHO | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.22 | 0.99 | relu | 15 | |
Proposed model (Double step) | HHO-ESOA | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.99 | leakyrelu | 9 | |
| Â | HHO-PSO | 0.0083 | 0.091 | 0.04 | 1 | leakyrelu | 22 | |
| Â | HHO-GA | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 0.99 | leakyrelu | 15 | |
| Â | HHO-HO | 1.43 | 1.19 | 0.81 | 0.99 | relu | 23 | |
Meghalaya | Â | HHO | 3.17 | 1.78 | 0.81 | 0.98 | leakyrelu | 1 |
Conventional model (Single step) | ESOA | 14.92 | 3.86 | 1.99 | 0.93 | relu | 16 | |
| Â | PSO | 2.59 | 1.61 | 0.67 | 0.98 | leakyrelu | 17 | |
|  | GA | 4.33 | 2.08 | 1.18 | 0.97 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
| Â | HO | 3.68 | 1.92 | 0.96 | 0.98 | relu | 1 | |
| Â | HHO-HHO | 2.95 | 1.71 | 0.65 | 0.98 | leakyrelu | 1 | |
Proposed model (Double step) | HHO-ESOA | 1.55 | 1.24 | 0.63 | 0.99 | relu | 1 | |
| Â | HHO-PSO | 1.49 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 0.99 | leakyrelu | 1 | |
| Â | HHO-GA | 1.51 | 1.23 | 0.62 | 0.99 | relu | 1 | |
| Â | HHO-HO | 1.43 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 0.99 | relu | 1 | |
Assam | Â | HHO | 2.64 | 1.62 | 0.96 | 0.97 | relu | 1 |
Conventional model (Single step) | ESOA | 4.68 | 2.16 | 1.62 | 0.95 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 11 | |
|  | PSO | 2.48 | 1.57 | 0.72 | 0.97 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 20 | |
|  | GA | 4.48 | 2.11 | 1.07 | 0.95 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
|  | HO | 2.6 | 1.61 | 1.07 | 0.97 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
|  | HHO-HHO | 3.2 | 1.78 | 0.83 | 0.96 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
Proposed model (Double step) | HHO-ESOA | 1.12 | 1.06 | 0.6 | 0.98 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
|  | HHO-PSO | 2.06 | 1.43 | 0.99 | 0.97 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
|  | HHO-GA | 1.59 | 1.26 | 0.59 | 0.98 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 | |
|  | HHO-HO | 1.58 | 1.26 | 0.56 | 0.98 | ‘leakyrelu’ | 1 |