Table 2 Ablation study concerning hyperparameters of the weighted averaging ensemble on the JUHCCR-v1.o dataset. The values 0.4, 0.3, and 0.3 are considered for \(w_1\), \(w_2\), and \(w_3\) since they give the best results.
From: JUHCCR-v1: a database for hand-drawn electrical and electronics circuit component recognition
Weight parameter | Performance score (in %) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(w_1\) | \(w_2\) | \(w_3\) | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
0.40 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 91.15 | 91.87 | 91.15 | 91.01 |
0.30 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 90.90 | 90.61 | 90.90 | 90.74 |
0.30 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 90.90 | 91.60 | 90.90 | 90.74 |
0.50 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 90.70 | 91.46 | 90.70 | 90.54 |
0.50 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 90.80 | 90.52 | 90.80 | 90.64 |
0.30 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 90.70 | 91.46 | 90.70 | 90.53 |
0.20 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 90.80 | 90.52 | 90.80 | 90.64 |
0.20 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 90.65 | 91.33 | 90.65 | 90.52 |
0.30 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 90.50 | 91.19 | 90.50 | 90.37 |
0.60 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 90.70 | 91.42 | 90.69 | 90.53 |
0.20 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 90.65 | 91.40 | 90.65 | 90.50 |
0.20 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 90.25 | 91.12 | 90.89 | 90.25 |
0.3342 | 0.3324 | 0.3335 | 90.85 | 91.56 | 90.85 | 90.69 |
