Table 4 Correlation between the markers and salt-responsive phenotypes in F3 populations.

From: F2 bulk segregant analysis reveals salt-tolerant QTLs related to the ubiquitination process

Marker

SES_D3

SES_D6

SES_D9

SES_D12

CMS (%)

RWC(%)

 

R

p value

R

p value

R

p value

R

p value

R

p value

R

p value

Marker A

0.25

2.5 × 10−1

0.62

3.5 × 10−2

0.74

1.4 × 10−2

0.77

9.5 × 10−3

0.81

5.6 × 10−3

0.81

5.7 × 10−3

Marker B

0.18

3.4 × 10−1

0.50

7.5 × 10−2

0.61

3.7 × 10−2

0.71

1.9 × 10−2

0.74

1.2 × 10−2

0.74

1.3 × 10−2

Marker C

0.25

2.5 × 10−1

0.55

5.8 × 10−2

0.66

2.8 × 10−2

0.71

1.8 × 10−2

0.76

1.1 × 10−2

0.76

1.1 × 10−2

Marker D

0.16

3.8 × 10−1

0.48

8.6 × 10−2

0.58

4.7 × 10−2

0.64

3.0X10−2

0.67

2.3 × 10−2

0.69

2.2 × 10−2

  1. SES was measured after stress for 3, 6, 9, and 12 days (SES_D3, SES_D6, SES_D9, and SES_D12, respectively), and CMS and RWC were measured after salt stress for 12 days. R, correlation; CMS, cell membrane stability; RWC, relative water content; SES, the standard evaluation score of visual salt injury.
Back to article page