Table 3 Logistic regression on the uptake of digital loans (N = 410).
Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|
Background characteristics | ||
Gender (Men) | Ref | Ref |
Women | 0.77 (0.41–1.44) | 0.416 |
Age category (18–30) | Ref | Ref |
30–40 years | 0.70 (0.32–1.54) | 0.377 |
40–50 years | 0.99 (0.38–2.56) | 0.983 |
Above 50 years | 2.72 (0.87–8.49) | 0.085 |
Years in business | 1.02 (0.97–1.07) | 0.476 |
Location business (Urban) | Ref | Ref |
Peri-urban | 1.40 (0.77–2.56) | 0.269 |
Rural | 1.86(0.16–21.28) | 0.619 |
Business size (Solo Entrepreneur (1)) | Ref | Ref |
Micro Business (2–9 employers) | 1.28 (0.57–2.84) | 0.547 |
Small Business (10–49 employers) | 0.64 (0.17–2.38) | 0.507 |
Business type (consultation & treatment) | Ref | Ref |
Pharmacy | 1.90 (0.95–3.76) | 0.068 |
Diagnostic centre | 1.04 (0.12–9.32) | 0.970 |
Financial need (never/rarely) | Ref | Ref |
Daily/weekly | 2.28 (0.94–5.52) | 0.067 |
Monthly | 4.22 (1.74–10.24) | 0.001** |
No specific pattern | 1.31 (0.49–3.53) | 0.591 |
Behavior characteristics | ||
Risk attitude (low risk taker) | Ref | Ref |
Average risk taker | 1.54 (0.69–3.44) | 0.295 |
High-risk taker | 2.32 (0.99–5.41) | 0.052* |
Perception towards digital loans (Negative) | Ref | Ref |
Neutral | 1.52 (0.70–3.34) | 0.293 |
Positive | 3.14 (1.46–6.79) | 0.004** |
Cons | 0.03 (0.01–0.12) | 0.000 |
Number of observations | 410 | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.14 | |