Fig. 2 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 2

From: Comparative omics profiling reveals differences in biomass, energy production, and vesicle transport between CHO and fast-growing CHL-YN cells

Fig. 2

Transcriptomics with GO and KEGG54,55 pathway enrichment analyses. Top 20 enriched biological process-related terms in GO enrichment analysis with DEGs upregulated greater than twofold (a) in CHL and CHL-IgG cells against parental CHO and CHO-K1-IgG cells, (b) in parental CHO and CHO-K1-IgG cells against CHL and CHL-IgG cells, (c) in CHL-IgG cells against CHO-K1-IgG cells, and (d) in CHO-K1-IgG cells against CHL-IgG cells. Significantly enriched terms in KEGG pathway enrichment analysis with DEGs upregulated greater than twofold (e) in CHL and CHL-IgG cells against parental CHO and CHO-K1-IgG cells, (f) in parental CHO and CHO-K1-IgG cells against CHL and CHL-IgG cells, (g) in CHL-IgG cells against CHO-K1-IgG cells, and (h) in CHO-K1-IgG cells against CHL-IgG cells. In the figures, the size of plots, the color of plots, and the x-axis indicate the number of DEGs categorized in each term, FDR transformed using -log10, and p-value transformed using -log10, respectively. P-values represent the raw statistical significance of enrichment, while q-values indicate the FDR-adjusted significance. Terms with p < 0.01 and q < 0.1 were considered significantly enriched in exploratory analysis. The use of the KEGG database in this study was conducted under authorization granted by Kanehisa Laboratories54,55.

Back to article page