Fig. 6 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 6

From: Micro aluminum-air batteries for extended operational duration of small-scale quadrotors

Fig. 6

(A) Power performance comparison between mAAB cells using fresh electrolytes, used electrolytes and rejuvenated electrolytes; B) 2 A discharge curves for cells across various electrolyte compositions, ranging from 4 M to 8M \(\:KOH\), all with 100 mM \(\:N{a}_{2}Sn{O}_{3}\); C) Summarized discharge energy density of cells with different electrolyte compositions when the power density is above the power threshold value – 800 \(\:\frac{W}{k{g}_{battery}}\); D) Discharge energy output of cells, under a 2 A discharge when above 800 \(\:\frac{W}{k{g}_{battery}},\:\)with different EA ratios for both the 7M \(\:KOH\) + 100 mM \(\:N{a}_{2}Sn{O}_{3}\) electrolyte and the 6M \(\:KOH\) + 100 mM \(\:N{a}_{2}Sn{O}_{3}\) electrolyte; E) Discharge energy density output of cells under a 2 A discharge when above 800 \(\:\frac{W}{k{g}_{battery}}\:\) with different EA ratios for both the 7M \(\:KOH\) + 100 mM \(\:N{a}_{2}Sn{O}_{3}\) electrolyte and the 6M \(\:KOH\) + 100 mM \(\:N{a}_{2}Sn{O}_{3}\) electrolyte.

Back to article page