Fig. 3 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 3

From: Empirical phenotyping of joint patient-care data supports hypothesis-driven investigation of mechanical ventilation consequences

Fig. 3

A representative example: patient 11. The plot panels (a–d) are the same as the previous figure. A flow trigger ((b), at purple arrows) near 3 and 13 hours are the only MV settings changes besides mode, PEEP, or tidal volume. The lower panels (e–g) examine the variability during the record interval 15–21 h under stationary ventilator settings. The mean (dashed black line) coincides with the golden pV loop (label #10) in the upper plot. The many distinct breath sub-types identified are more similar than to other main types in the upper plot; as a result, they are grouped together at this choice of hyper-parameters. Internal phenotype variability suggests continuous LVS changes that may not admit a natural discretization. Colors coordinate between (a) and (d), and among (eg). Labeling and coloring in this figure do not relate to other figures.

Back to article page