Table 4 Comparative Analysis of all the models in terms of R² score.

S. no.	\(AD\)	LR	SVM	DT	CB	XGR
1	h₁	0.0927	0.6061	0.8704	0.9294	0.9214
2	h₂	0.1034	0.8077	0.9323	0.9738	0.9568
3	h₃	0.0055	0.6211	0.7954	0.9142	0.8905
4	h₄	0.016	0.4822	0.6263	0.7769	0.7213
5	h₆	0.0049	0.2912	0.3458	0.6312	0.5156
6	h₈	0.0292	0.3782	0.8194	0.9211	0.8718
7	s₁	0.0636	0.3572	0.7687	0.8879	0.8851
8	s₂	0.0892	0.7822	0.981	0.9927	0.9817
9	s₃	0.0893	0.8211	0.9734	0.992	0.9853
10	w₁	0.0016	0.2515	0.4158	0.7037	0.5944
11	w₂	− 0.0036	− 0.0003	− 0.0998	− 0.0622	− 0.1156
12	w₃	− 0.0036	− 0.0003	− 1.0679	− 0.5749	− 0.1693
13	x	0.2979	0.814	0.9902	0.9969	0.9898

Quick links

Search