Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a Cunninghamia lanceolata common garden experiment in Dagangshan
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 March 2026

Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a Cunninghamia lanceolata common garden experiment in Dagangshan

  • Tingyu Xu1,2,3,
  • Xiang Niu1,2,3,
  • Bing Wang1,2,3 &
  • …
  • Yihui Wang1,2,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 35 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecophysiology
  • Forest ecology

Abstract

Plant functional traits represent resource acquisition strategies and, consequently, reflect ecosystem functions. As a critical focus on functional trait research, the study of intraspecific variation and vertical gradients in canopies can better reveal plant adaptation mechanisms to environmental conditions. In this study, we examined five provenances of Cunninghamia lanceolata in the common garden of Dagangshan, Jiangxi. We measured and analyzed nine functional trait indicators: the leaf dry matter content, relative chlorophyll content, specific leaf area, leaf tissue density, water use efficiency, leaf carbon content, leaf nitrogen content, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and equivalent water thickness. The results revealed that canopy height has a minor effect on the variation in leaf functional traits, with most of the variation attributed to geographic provenances. Notably, 50% of the leaf functional traits presented significant correlations, which were mainly associated with photosynthetic capacity-related traits. The correlations of leaf functional traits between the average canopy values and the middle part of the canopy are similar. The influence of canopy height on leaf functional traits in subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata artificial forests is limited, but the provenances had a certain impact on the leaf functional traits. The consistency of trait relationships between middle part and the entire canopy making it feasible to analyze forest ecosystem functions by collecting leaf samples from the middle canopy. This study provides scientific evidence for research on the functional dynamics of Cunninghamia lanceolata artificial forest ecosystems and the selection of superior provenances.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Pérez-Ramos, I. M. et al. Functional traits and phenotypic plasticity modulate species coexistence across contrasting climatic conditions. Nat. Commun. 10, 2555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10453-0 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gabriele, M. et al. Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation. Glob Chang. Biol. 25, 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14646 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, Q. et al. The relationship between the main leaf traits and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of phragmites australis under different habitats of a salt marsh in Qinwangchuan, China. AoB Plants. 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac054 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, I. J. et al. The world-wide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chave, J. et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Let. 12 (4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E-Vojtkó, A. et al. Floral and reproductive traits are an independent dimension within the plant economic spectrum of temperate central Europe. New. Phytolo. 236, 1964–1975. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18386 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kleyer, M. & Minden, V. Why functional ecology should consider all plant organs: an allocation-based perspective. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.11.002 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, R. et al. Coordination of economics spectra in leaf, stem and root within the genus Artemisia along a large environmental gradient in China. Glob Ecol. Biogeo. 00, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13624 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reich, P. B. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102 (2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J. L. et al. A whole-plant economics spectrum including bark functional traits for 59 subtropical woody plant species. J. Ecol. 110, 248–261 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, Y. T., Ali, A. & Yan, E. R. The plant economics spectrum is structured by leaf habits and growth forms across subtropical species. Tree Physiol. 37, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw098 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kramp, R. E. et al. Functional traits and their plasticity shift from tolerant to avoidant under extreme drought. Ecology 103 (12), e3826. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3826 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vendramini, F. et al. Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New. Phytol. 154, 1. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00357.x (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, N. et al. Leaf functional traits and ecological strategies of common plant species in evergreen broad-leaved forests on Huangshan mountain. J. Res. 35, 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01780-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, X. J. & Ma, K. P. Plant functional traits—Concepts, applications and future directions. Scientia Sinica Vitae. 45, 4. https://doi.org/10.1360/N052014-00244 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel, C. B. Unifying functional and population ecology to test the adaptive value of traits. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13107 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, H. et al. Coordination of leaf functional traits under climatic warming in an arid ecosystem. BMC Plant. Biol. 22, 439. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03818-z (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, S. H. et al. Changes of leaf functional traits in karst rocky desertification ecological environment and the driving factors. Glob Ecol. Conserv. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01381 (2020).

  19. Deng, F. Y. et al. Changes in leaf functional traits driven by environmental filtration in different monsoon tropical forest types. Forests 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14102101 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sandra, D. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset. Sci. Data, 9, 475 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01774-9. (2022).

  21. Li, Y. et al. Leaf trait networks based on global data: representing variation and adaptation in plants. Front. Plant. Sci. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.710530 (2021).

  22. Andrea, C. W. et al. Photosynthetic rates influence the population dynamics of understory herbs in stochastic light environments. Ecology 98, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1664 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christopher, H. L. Leaf functional trait variation in a humid temperate forest, and relationships with juvenile tree light requirements. PeerJ 7, e6855. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6855 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bigelow, S. W. Leaf nutrients in relation to stature and life form in tropical rain forest. J. Veget Sci. 4, 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235599 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aaron, G. K. et al. Leaf traits and canopy structure together explain canopy functional diversity: an airborne remote sensing approach. Ecol. Appl. 31, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2230 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paź-Dyderska, S. et al. On the sunny side of the crown-quantification of intra-canopy SLA variation among 179 taxa. Ecol. Manag. 472, 118254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118254 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zuleta, D. et al. Interspecific and intraspecific variation of tree branch, leaf and stomatal traits in relation to topography in an aseasonal Amazon forest. Funct. Ecol. 36, 2955–2968. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14199 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Poorter, H. et al. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New. Phytol. 182, 565–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ye, X. et al. Species divergence in seedling leaf traits and tree growth response to nitrogen and phosphorus additions in an evergreen broadleaved forest of subtropical China. J. Res. 34, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01437-2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yao, L. J. et al. Variation in the functional traits of forest vegetation along compound habitat gradients in different climatic zones in China. Forests 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061232 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Z. J. et al. Divergent patterns and drivers of leaf functional traits of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis plantations along a precipitation gradient in the Loess Plateau, China. J. Environ. Manag. 348, 119318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119318 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jana, D. & Jan, D. Along with intraspecific functional trait variation, individual performance is key to resolving community assembly processes. Funct. Ecol. 34, 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13646 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Facundo, X. P., Gustavo, J. F. & Mariano, O. Does accounting for within-individual trait variation matter for measuring functional diversity? Ecol. Indic. 102, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.018 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Olivia, L. C. et al. Trait plasticity and trade-offs shape intra-specific variation in competitive response in a foundation tree species. New. Phytol. 230, 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17166 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Florian, H., Eduardo, C. & Åke, B. Mechanisms driving plant functional trait variation in a tropical forest. Ecol. Evol. 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7256 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Albert, C. H. et al. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra-vs. Interspecific variability in plant traits. Funct. Ecol. 24, 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01727.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Siefert, A. et al. A global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 18, 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12508 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Laughlin, D. C. Applying trait- based models to achieve functional targets for theory- driven ecological restoration. Ecol. Lett. 18, 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12288 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Niemczyk, M. et al. How geographic and climatic factors affect the adaptation of Douglas-fir provenances to the temperate continental climate zone in Europe. Eur. J. For. Res. 140, 1341–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01398-5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Klisz, M. et al. Limitations at the limit? Diminishing of genetic effects in Norway Spruce provenance trials. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00306 (2019a).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hevia, A. et al. Which matters more for wood traits in Pinus halepensis Mill., provenance or climate? Ann. For. Sci. 77, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00956-y (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mihai, G. et al. Impact of climate change and adaptive genetic potential of Norway spruce at the southeastern range of species distribution. Agric. Meteorol. 291, 108040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108040 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fei, Y. et al. Efects of diferent undergrowth vegetation management measures on soil characteristics and timber outturn of Cunninghamia lanceolata large-diameter timber cultivation plantation. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. https://doi.org/10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.8011 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. State Forestry and Grassland Administration of China. China Forest Resources Report (2014–2018) (China Forestry, 2019).

  45. Zheng, Y. H. & Liang, Y. C. A study on the provenances selection of Chinese Fir in the Dagangshan region (in Chinese). For. Res. 5 (1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1992.01.001 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cornelissen, J. H., Lavore, C. & Garnier, S. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51, 335–380. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt02124 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N. et al. New handbook for the standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 61 (3), 167–234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Farquhar, G. D. & Richards, R. A. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Australian J. Plant. Physiol. 11, 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9840539 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rozendaal, D. M. A., Hurtado, V. H. & Poorter, L. Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationships with light demand and adult stature. Funct. Ecol. 20, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01105.x (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shen, T. et al. Microclimatic variation in tropical canopies: A glimpse into the processes of community assembly in epiphytic bryophyte communities. J. Ecol. 110, 3023–3038. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14011 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wright, S. J. et al. Functional traits and the growth-mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecol. Lett. 91, 12, 3664–3674. https://doi.org/10.2307/29779549 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Feng, J. Y. et al. Vertical variation in leaf traits and crown structure promote the coexistence of forest tree species. Forests 13, 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101548 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jin, N. et al. Vertical variation in leaf functional traits of Parashorea chinensis with different canopy layers. Frot Plant. Sci. 15, 1335524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1335524 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Adam, P. C., Marilyn, L. F. & Geoffrey, G. P. Canopy gradients in leaf functional traits for species that differ in growth strategies and shade tolerance. Tree Physiol. 37, 10, 1415–1425. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx048 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, X. Q. et al. Enhancing ecosystem productivity and stability with increasing canopy structural complexity in global forests. Sci. Adv. 10 .https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adl (1947). eadl1947(2024).

  56. Wu, Q. L. et al. Effects of leaf age and canopy structure on gross ecosystem production in a subtropical evergreen Chinese Fir forest. Agri Metero. 310, 108618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108618 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Xiao, W. F. Study on Photosynthetic Physiology and Ecology Simulation of Canopy in Chinese Fir Plantation (Chinese Academy of Forestry, 1994).

  58. Xiao, W. F. et al. The spatial and temporal characteristics of photosynthesis and transpiration of needles of Chinese Fir. Scientia Slivae Sinicae. 38 (5), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.11707/j.1001-7488.20020507 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Petter, G. et al. Functional leaf traits of vascular epiphytes: vertical trends within the forest, intra- and interspecific trait variability, and taxonomic signals. Func Ecol. 30, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12490 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Burton, J. I. et al. Intraspecific variability and reaction norms of forest understory plant species traits. Func Ecol. 31, 10, 1881–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12898 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, Q. W. et al. Testing trait plasticity over the range of spectral composition of sunlight in forb species differing in shade tolerance. J. Ecol. 108, 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13384 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kenzo, T. et al. Height-related changes in leaf photosynthetic traits in diverse Bornean tropical rain forest trees. Oecologia 177 (1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3126-0 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Boroski, C. A. et al. Leaf transpiration decreases similarly among five pine species as height increases over stand development. Tree Physio. tpaf093. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf093 (2025).

  64. He, D. & Yan, E. R. Size-dependent variations in individual traits and trait scalingrelationships within a shade-tolerant evergreen tree species. Am. J. Bot. 105 (7), 1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1132 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang, Y. Variations in Leaf Traits with Plant Size and Leaf Height in Karst Forest Trees (Guizhou Normal University, 2022).

  66. Tian, J. X. et al. Vertical variation of leaf functional traits in temperate forest canopies in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 38 (23), 8383–8391. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201801020006 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kunstler, G. et al. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nature 529 (7585), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16476 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yang, L. et al. Hydraulic architecture and photosynthetic characteristics of Chinese Fir at different canopies heights. J. For. Environ. 44 (5), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2024.05.003 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang, J. C. & Sheng, W. T. The study on decay of dead branches and leaves on living trees taken from crown into litter environment in a Chinese Fir plantation, compared with decay in canopy. Scientia Slivae Sinicae. 37 (6), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.11707/j.1001-7488.20010602 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Song, L. Y., Peng, C. L. & Peng, S. L.Comparison of leaf construction costs between three invasive speciesand three native species. South. China Bio Sci. 17 (4), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09077 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tang, S. B. et al. Addition of nitrogen to canopy versus understorey has different effects on leaf traits of understorey plants in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. J. Ecol., 109(2), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13496

  72. Xu, T. Y. et al. Variations in leaf functional traits and photosynthetic parameters of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances. Forests 14, 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091708 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Xu, R. et al. Intraspecific variations in leaf functional traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances. BMC Plant. Biol. 23, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04097-y (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dong, X. X. et al. Leaf traits of prickly ash and its correlation with ecological and geographical factors of origin. Sci. Rep. 14, 1, 6276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56962-x (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Luo, T. et al. Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan(in Chinese). Biodi Sci. 30, 21414 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yue, K. et al. Nitrogen supply affects grain yield by regulating antioxidant enzyme activity and photosynthetic capacity of maize plant in the Loess Plateau. Agronomy 11, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061094 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply thankful to the reviewers for their invaluable comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the the Central Non-profit Research Institution of CAF, grant number CAFYBB2020ZE003, and Jiangxi Dagangshan National Key Field Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem, grant number 2060204-25-201.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China

    Tingyu Xu, Xiang Niu, Bing Wang & Yihui Wang

  2. Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

    Tingyu Xu, Xiang Niu, Bing Wang & Yihui Wang

  3. Dagangshan National Key Field Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem, Xinyu, 338033, China

    Tingyu Xu, Xiang Niu, Bing Wang & Yihui Wang

Authors
  1. Tingyu Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiang Niu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bing Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yihui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tingyu Xu: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing. Xiang Niu: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing-review & editing. Bing Wang: Investigation, Project administration. Yihui Wang: Data curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Niu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, T., Niu, X., Wang, B. et al. Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a Cunninghamia lanceolata common garden experiment in Dagangshan. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24811-0

Download citation

  • Received: 21 June 2025

  • Accepted: 15 October 2025

  • Published: 31 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24811-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Geographical provenances
  • Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio
  • Specific leaf area
  • Equivalent water thickness
  • Water use efficiency
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing