Table 4 Treatment response with respect to platelet activation status in ITP patients.

From: A design for an efficient functional panel that determines platelet exhaustion levels to differentiate responder and non-responder ITP patients

Characteristics

Group

N

Mean ± SD

Median (Min-Mix)

P-value*

AUC

(95%CI)

Cut-off value

Sensitivity

Specificity

Age

Non-responder

20

17.75 ± 10.01

12.50 (10–39)

0.013

80.6

(64.5–96.8)

16.5

100

60.0

Responder

8

28 ± 9.04

28.50 (17–40)

P-selectin (Base)

Non-responder

20

2.59 ± 1.53

1.93 (1.18–6.45)

0.013

80.9

(65.0–96.9.0.9)

1.745

100

65.0

Responder

8

1.43 ± 0.22

1.50 (1.02–1.66)

PAC-1 (Base)

Non-responder

20

1.88 ± 0.31

1.79 (1.56–2.9)

0.919

51.6

(25.0–78.1.0.1)

1.88

75.0

40.0

Responder

8

1.88 ± 0.33

1.77 (1.55–2.43)

ROS (Base)

Non-responder

20

1.64 ± 0.48

1.51 (1.07–2.88)

0.334

62.2

(37.0–87.4.0.4)

2.05

50.0

85.0

Responder

8

1.87 ± 0.56

1.82 (1.17–2.7)

P-sel (PMA)

Non-responder

20

3.5 ± 1.1

3.27 (2–5.68.68)

0.036

79.7

(62.0–97.3.0.3)

3.36

100.0

55.0

Responder

8

5.17 ± 1.79

4.58 (3.39–8.52)

PAC-1 (PMA)

Non-responder

20

2.31 ± 0.35

2.38 (1.61–2.8)

0.006

84.1

(68.6–99.5)

2.625

75.0

85.0

Responder

8

3.26 ± 1.09

2.70 (2.45–5.45)

ROS (PMA)

Non-responder

20

5.75 ± 1.25

5.54 (3.62–7.89)

0.011

85.6

(69.5–100.0)

8.02

62.5

100.0

Responder

8

7.86 ± 1.74

8.57 (5.5–9.6)

PLT count

non-responder

20

55.2 ± 41.98

44.00 (12–171)

0.016

79.4

(60.5–98.2)

50.5

87.5

60.0

Responder

8

119.88 ± 74.14

99.00 (36–207)

  1. *Comparing two groups treatment response. AUC, Area Under the Curve; ITP, Immune Thrombocytopenic; PLT, platelet.