Table 4 Scores of usability and user satisfaction of the developed system.
Participant | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of uses | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3.6 |
SUS | 77.5 | 72.5 | 92.5 | 77.5 | 72.5 | 55.0 | 67.5 | 55.0 | 55.0 | 75.0 | 55.0 | 82.5 | 77.5 | 100.0 | 65.0 | 80.0 | 73.8 |
QUEST-like mean of sub-items | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
Size | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.0 |
Weight | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4.5 |
Ease of adjustment | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3.5 |
Safety | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5.0 |
Durability | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4.0 |
Ease of use | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4.0 |
Comfort | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4.0 |
Effectiveness | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4.0 |
