Table 3 Nested model performance for the effect of condition and region on cerebral oxygen exchange (HbO -– HbR) Results.

From: Brain benefits of deep learning-based noise management in experienced hearing aid users using functional near infrared spectroscopy

 

Fixed Effects

Goodness of fit and comparison

Model

Est.

SE

df

t

p

\(\:\chi\:\:\)2

AIC

df

p

Baseline

Intercept

0.11

2.44

26.9

0.05

0.963

 

20,655

  

+ Main effect

Intercept

−7.419

5.91

31.0

−1.26

0.21

8.91

20,650

2

0.012

Listening program (DNN)

−7.50

3.51

1775

−2.13

0.033

    

Handedness (Right)

13.4

6.14

26.0

2.18

0.039

    

+ Interaction

Intercept

−7.165

6.88

55.9

−1.04

0.30

10.79

20,648

4

0.029

Listening program (DNN)

−18.97

6.07

1775

−3.13

0.002

    

Region (LM)

−2.64

6.01

1783

−0.43

0.660

    

Region (RL)

1.93

6.14

1795

0.31

0.753

    

Handedness (Right)

134

6.17

25.9

2.18

0.038

    

Listening program (DNN) *Region (LM)

18.42

8.49

1775

2.17

0.030

    

Listening program (DNN) *Region (RL)

15.91

8.67

1775

1.84

0.067

    
  1. SE = standard error; df = degrees of freedom; AIC = Akaike information criterion; LM = lower medial; RL = right lateral. The reference groups for listening program, region, and handedness were standard listening, left lateral, and left-handedness, respectively.
Back to article page