Table 3 Sidak post hoc pairwise comparisons of TCI-R dimensions: effect sizes and Power.

From: The relationship between personality dimensions and addiction type in women addicted to alcohol and opioids

TCI-R dimension

Comparison

Mean diff.

Std. error

p-value

Cohen’s d [95% CI]

Statistical power (%)

Novelty seeking

OUD vs. HC

12.00*

2.21

< 0.001

0.87 [0.56, 1.18]

100

OUD vs. AUD

10.09*

2.21

< 0.001

0.71 [0.41, 1.01]

99

AUD vs. HC

1.91

2.21

0.77

0.14 [-0.16, 0.44]

14

Harm avoidance

OUD vs. HC

1.99

2.44

0.80

0.13 [-0.17, 0.43]

13

OUD vs. AUD

-1.54

2.44

0.90

-0.10 [-0.40, 0.20]

9

AUD vs. HC

3.52

2.44

0.39

0.23 [-0.07, 0.53]

31

Reward dependence

OUD vs. HC

1.78

1.79

0.69

0.16 [-0.14, 0.46]

18

OUD vs. AUD

1.71

1.79

0.71

0.15 [-0.15, 0.45]

16

AUD vs. HC

0.06

1.79

1.00

0.01 [-0.29, 0.31]

5

Persistence

OUD vs. HC

5.46

3.10

0.22

0.29 [-0.01, 0.59]

45

OUD vs. AUD

2.96

3.10

0.71

0.15 [-0.15, 0.45]

15

AUD vs. HC

2.50

3.10

0.81

0.13 [-0.17, 0.43]

12

Self-directedness

OUD vs. HC

-25.01*

3.03

< 0.001

-1.37 [-1.69, -1.05]

100

OUD vs. AUD

-20.54*

3.03

< 0.001

-1.03 [-1.35, -0.71]

100

AUD vs. HC

-4.48

3.03

0.37

-0.23 [-0.55, 0.09]

31

Cooperativeness

OUD vs. HC

-6.91*

2.30

0.009

-0.46 [-0.77, -0.15]

83

OUD vs. AUD

-9.09*

2.30

< 0.001

-0.61 [-0.92, -0.30]

97

AUD vs. HC

2.18

2.30

0.72

0.16 [-0.15, 0.46]

17

Self-transcendence

OUD vs. HC

 

2.36

< 0.001

1.00 [0.68, 1.32]

100

OUD vs. AUD

 

2.36

< 0.001

0.94 [0.62, 1.26]

99

AUD vs. HC

 

2.36

0.77

0.14 [-0.16, 0.44]

14

  1. *Indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05; OUD = Women with Opioid Use Disorder, AUD = Women with Alcohol Use Disorder, HC = Healthy Controls; Statistical power calculated for α = 0.05, two-tailed tests.