Table 5 Sidak post hoc pairwise comparisons of NEO PI-R domains: effect sizes and power.

From: The relationship between personality dimensions and addiction type in women addicted to alcohol and opioids

NEO-PI-R dimension

Comparison

Mean difference

Std. error

p-value

Cohen’s d [95% CI]

Statistical power (%)

Neuroticism

OUD vs. HC

18.61*

3.30

< 0.001

0.91 [0.51, 1.31]

99.9

OUD vs. AUD

13.09*

3.30

< 0.001

0.61 [0.22, 0.99]

92.1

AUD vs. HC

5.52

3.30

0.261

0.27 [-0.11, 0.65]

23.9

Extraversion

OUD vs. HC

4.75

2.73

0.229

0.29 [-0.09, 0.67]

27.8

OUD vs. AUD

9.79*

2.73

0.001

0.57 [0.18, 0.96]

88.2

AUD vs. HC

-5.04

2.73

0.185

-0.28 [-0.66, 0.10]

26.3

Openness to experience

OUD vs. HC

9.32*

2.83

0.003

0.53 [0.14, 0.91]

82.4

OUD vs. AUD

5.96

2.83

0.105

0.34 [-0.04, 0.72]

40.6

AUD vs. HC

3.36

2.83

0.555

0.18 [-0.10, 0.56]

10.3

Agreeableness

OUD vs. HC

-12.09*

2.34

< 0.001

-0.87 [-1.27, -0.48]

99.9

OUD vs. AUD

-11.00*

2.34

< 0.001

-0.71 [-1.10, -0.32]

98.0

AUD vs. HC

-1.08

2.34

0.954

0.07 [-0.45, 0.30]

2.9

Conscientiousness

OUD vs. HC

-15.64*

3.16

< 0.001

-0.83 [-1.22, -0.43]

99.7

OUD vs. AUD

-13.02*

3.16

< 0.001

-0.65 [-1.04, -0.26]

95.4

AUD vs. HC

-2.61

3.16

0.793

-0.13 [-0.51, 0.25]

5.9

  1. *Indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05; OUD = Women with Opioid Use Disorder, AUD = Women with Alcohol Use Disorder, HC = Healthy Controls; Statistical power calculated for α = 0.05, two-tailed tests.