Table 5 Comparison of Mask Merging Methods.
From: BoxCell: Leveraging SAM for Cell Segmentation with Box Supervision
Model | Time (sec) | ConSep | MoNuSeg | TNBC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dice | IoU | Dice | IoU | Dice | IoU | ||
AP (ITS, ITD) | 1.20 | 80.55 | 67.69 | 80.04 | 66.86 | 82.92 | 70.97 |
LP (ITS, ITD) | 1.26 | 80.59 | 66.70 | 79.57 | 66.37 | 78.48 | 70.07 |
ENet (ITS, ITD) | 2.63 | 80.23 | 67.40 | 80.07 | 66.59 | 82.26 | 71.07 |
BoxCell - Sparse | 15.00 | 80.15 | 67.10 | 80.21 | 67.02 | 85.02 | 74.07 |
BoxCell - Gurobi | 69.02 | 81.39 | 68.82 | 81.74 | 69.25 | 85.01 | 74.06 |
