Table 6 Regression analysis results.

From: The impact of servant leadership on employees taking charge behavior

 

TCB

TCB

IM

GX

TCB

TCB

TCB

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

SL

 

0.755*** [0.034]

0.771*** [0.035]

0.613*** [0.047]

0.447*** [0.049]

  

IM

    

0.233*** [0.052]

0.704*** [0.035]

 

GX

    

0.210*** [0.039]

 

0.659*** [0.035]

IM×HL

     

0.124*** [0.040]

 

GX×HL

      

0.164*** [0.043]

HL

     

0.006 [0.044]

-0.100* [0.050]

Gender

-0.031 [0.107]

0.013 [0.070]

-0.020 [0.073]

-0.142 [0.099]

0.046 [0.066]

0.035 [0.074]

0.102* [0.081]

Age

-0.078 [0.051]

0.027 [0.034]

0.025 [0.035]

0.161 [0.048]

-0.013 [0.032]

-0.020 [0.036]

-0.089 [0.039]

Education

0.102* [0.073]

0.041 [0.048]

0.015 [0.049]

-0.058 [0.067]

0.050 [0.044]

0.038 [0.051]

0.067 [0.055]

Firm size

-0.050 [0.043]

-0.003 [0.028]

0.000 [0.030]

0.117 [0.040]

-0.028 [0.026]

-0.012 [0.030]

-0.086 [0.032]

Working experience

-0.027 [0.044]

-0.007 [0.029]

-0.057 [0.030]

-0.073 [0.041]

0.022 [0.027]

0.031 [0.030]

0.037 [0.033]

R2

0.020

0.571

0.599

0.394

0.640

0.537

0.449

Adj R2

0.003

0.564

0.592

0.384

0.632

0.526

0.436

F

1.189

77.450

86.919

37.861

77.084

50.279

35.318

f2

1.284

1.722

1.117

0.780

  1. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; SL , servant leadership; IM, intrinsic motivation; GX, supervisor-subordinate guanxi; TCB, taking charge behavior; HL, hierarchical levels.